Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 21–30 of 115 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (No. 23-1275)
The Supreme Court case *Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic* (2025) addresses whether individual Medicaid beneficiaries can sue state officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for alleged violations of the Medicaid Act's any-qualified-provider provision, which requires states to allow Medicaid recipients … The Supreme Court case *Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic* (2025) addresses whether individual Medicaid beneficiaries can sue state officials …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
DHS v. D.V.D. (No. 24A1153(06-23-25))
The Supreme Court granted a stay on a preliminary injunction issued by a lower court regarding the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) practice of removing non-citizens to third countries. The injunction required DHS to provide written notice and a meaningful … The Supreme Court granted a stay on a preliminary injunction issued by a lower court regarding the Department of Homeland …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Esteras v. United States (No. 23-7483)
The Supreme Court case *Esteras v. United States* (2025) addresses whether district courts can consider retribution when revoking supervised release. The Court held that district courts cannot consider 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)(2)(A), which concerns retribution for the original offense, when deciding … The Supreme Court case *Esteras v. United States* (2025) addresses whether district courts can consider retribution when revoking supervised release. …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Stanley v. City of Sanford (No. 23-997)
The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects retirees from disability-based discrimination regarding retirement benefits. The Court held that to prevail under §12112(a), a plaintiff must … The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (No. 24-7)
The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge the EPA's approval of California regulations under the Clean Air Act. These regulations mandate that automakers manufacture more electric vehicles … The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Environmental Protection & Climate Action ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization (No. 24-20)
The Supreme Court case *Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization* (2025) addresses whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) violates the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The PSJVTA allows U.S. nationals injured by international terrorism to … The Supreme Court case *Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization* (2025) addresses whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Safety & Crime Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (No. 23-1187)
The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge FDA decisions regarding the marketing of new tobacco products. The court held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco … The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. (No. 23-1226)
The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act and its impact on district courts' ability to review agency interpretations of statutes in enforcement proceedings. The Court held that … The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
NRC v. Texas (No. 23-1300)
The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision in *NRC v. Texas*, holding that Texas and Fasken were not entitled to judicial review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) licensing decision regarding a private off-site nuclear waste storage facility. The … The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision in *NRC v. Texas*, holding that Texas and Fasken were not entitled …
—
Environmental Protection & Climate Action ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Safety & Crime Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Oklahoma v. EPA (No. 23-1067)
The Supreme Court case *Oklahoma v. EPA* (2025) addresses the venue for challenging the EPA's disapproval of state implementation plans (SIPs) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Court held that EPA's disapprovals of Oklahoma and Utah's SIPs are locally … The Supreme Court case *Oklahoma v. EPA* (2025) addresses the venue for challenging the EPA's disapproval of state implementation plans …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source