Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 31–40 of 115 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Perttu v. Richards (No. 23-1324)
The Supreme Court case Perttu v. Richards (2025) addresses whether a party has the right to a jury trial on Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) exhaustion when the exhaustion issue is intertwined with the merits of the underlying claim. The … The Supreme Court case Perttu v. Richards (2025) addresses whether a party has the right to a jury trial on …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
United States v. Skrmetti (No. 23-477)
The Supreme Court case *United States v. Skrmetti* (2025) concerns a Tennessee law (SB1) that restricts gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors. The Court held that SB1 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court … The Supreme Court case *United States v. Skrmetti* (2025) concerns a Tennessee law (SB1) that restricts gender-affirming medical treatments for …
—
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (No. 23-1229)
The Supreme Court case *EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.* (No. 23-1229) addresses the venue for judicial review of EPA actions under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The central issue is whether the EPA's denial of small refinery exemptions from … The Supreme Court case *EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.* (No. 23-1229) addresses the venue for judicial review of EPA …
Environmental Protection & Climate Action ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School Dist. No. 279 (No. 24-249)
The Supreme Court case A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools addresses the standard of proof required for schoolchildren bringing claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act related to their education. The Court unanimously held … The Supreme Court case A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools addresses the standard of proof required for schoolchildren bringing …
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Commissioner v. Zuch (No. 24-416)
The Supreme Court case *Commissioner v. Zuch* (2025) addresses the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court in collection due process (CDP) hearings when the IRS is no longer pursuing a levy. The court held that the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction … The Supreme Court case *Commissioner v. Zuch* (2025) addresses the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court in collection due process …
—
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Martin v. United States (No. 24-362)
The Supreme Court case *Martin v. United States* (No. 24-362) addresses the scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) regarding government liability for torts committed by federal employees, specifically in the context of a wrong-house raid. The Court clarifies … The Supreme Court case *Martin v. United States* (No. 24-362) addresses the scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) …
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Parrish v. United States (No. 24-275)
The Supreme Court case Parrish v. United States addresses the procedural requirements for filing a notice of appeal after a district court has reopened the appeal period under 28 U.S.C. §2107(c). The Court held that a litigant who files a … The Supreme Court case Parrish v. United States addresses the procedural requirements for filing a notice of appeal after a …
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Soto v. United States (No. 24-320)
The Supreme Court case *Soto v. United States* (No. 24-320) addresses whether the statute providing combat-related special compensation (CRSC) to qualifying veterans constitutes "another law" that displaces the Barring Act's default settlement procedures and its 6-year limitations period. The Court … The Supreme Court case *Soto v. United States* (No. 24-320) addresses whether the statute providing combat-related special compensation (CRSC) to …
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
National Security & Defense ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Rivers v. Guerrero (No. 23-1345)
The Supreme Court case *Rivers v. Guerrero* addresses the classification of second or successive habeas corpus petitions under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). The Court held that once a district court enters a judgment on an initial … The Supreme Court case *Rivers v. Guerrero* addresses the classification of second or successive habeas corpus petitions under the Antiterrorism …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
SSA v. AFSCME (No. 24A1063)
This document is a Supreme Court decision regarding a stay application in the case of *Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees*. The case concerns an executive order establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) … This document is a Supreme Court decision regarding a stay application in the case of *Social Security Administration v. American …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source