Presidential Actions
Bills of Congress
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 91โ€“100 of 120 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Glossip v. Oklahoma (No. 22-7466)
The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing use of false testimony in a capital murder trial. The Court reversed the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' (OCCA) decision, โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621)
The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case becomes moot before a final judgment, qualify as "prevailing parties" eligible for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. ยง1988(b). The Court โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Rimlawi v. United States (No. 24-23)
The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United States, Shah v. United States, and Jacob v. United States) from the Fifth Circuit. The central issue is whether a โ€ฆ The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Carter v. United States (No. 23-1281)
The document is a dissent from a denial of certiorari in the case of Carter v. United States. Justice Thomas argues that the Supreme Court should revisit the Feres doctrine, a judicially created exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act โ€ฆ The document is a dissent from a denial of certiorari in the case of Carter v. United States. Justice Thomas โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Gonzalez v. United States (No. 24-5577)
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Gonzalez v. United States, a case concerning whether the Fourth Amendment incorporates the common-law 'in-the-presence' requirement for warrantless misdemeanor arrests. Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Gorsuch, issued a statement respecting the denial, highlighting the โ€ฆ The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Gonzalez v. United States, a case concerning whether the Fourth Amendment incorporates the common-law โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Coalition Life v. Carbondale (No. 24-57)
This document is a dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of *Coalition Life v. Carbondale*. Justice Thomas argues that the Court should have taken the case to clarify the status of *Hill v. Colorado*, a case upholding โ€ฆ This document is a dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of *Coalition Life v. Carbondale*. Justice Thomas โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Pina v. Dominguez (No. 24-152)
This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the case of Pina v. Dominguez. The case concerns the qualified immunity of a police officer (Pina) who used โ€ฆ This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Woodward v. California (No. 24-227)
The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Woodward v. California. The case concerns the potential violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Woodward was tried twice for โ€ฆ The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Woodward v. California. โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Hungary v. Simon (No. 23-867)
The Supreme Court case, Hungary v. Simon, revolves around the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and its expropriation exception. The court unanimously held that alleging the commingling of funds alone is insufficient to establish the commercial nexus required to sue โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case, Hungary v. Simon, revolves around the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and its expropriation exception. The โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath (No. 23-1127)
The Supreme Court case *Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath* (2025) concerns whether reimbursement requests under the E-Rate program qualify as "claims" under the False Claims Act (FCA). The Court held that E-Rate reimbursement requests do qualify โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath* (2025) concerns whether reimbursement requests under the โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source