Presidential Actions
Bills of Congress
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 21–30 of 120 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Mahmoud v. Taylor (No. 24-297)
The Supreme Court case *Mahmoud v. Taylor* (2025) addresses the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment in the context of public education. The Court held that the Montgomery County Board of Education's policy of including LGBTQ+-inclusive storybooks in the … The Supreme Court case *Mahmoud v. Taylor* (2025) addresses the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment in the context …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Religious Freedom & Expression ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Family & Community Well-being ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (No. 24-316)
The Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (No. 24-316) concerns the Appointments Clause of the Constitution and the structure of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision, holding that Task Force members … The Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (No. 24-316) concerns the Appointments Clause of the Constitution and the …
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Family & Community Well-being ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Religious Freedom & Expression ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (No. 23-1275)
The Supreme Court case *Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic* (2025) addresses whether individual Medicaid beneficiaries can sue state officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for alleged violations of the Medicaid Act's any-qualified-provider provision, which requires states to allow Medicaid recipients … The Supreme Court case *Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic* (2025) addresses whether individual Medicaid beneficiaries can sue state officials …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Riley v. Bondi Revisions: 6/26/25 (No. 23-1270)
The Supreme Court case *Riley v. Bondi* addresses the timeliness of petitions for review in immigration cases, specifically concerning orders of removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. The Court held that a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order in … The Supreme Court case *Riley v. Bondi* addresses the timeliness of petitions for review in immigration cases, specifically concerning orders …
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Hewitt v. United States (No. 23-1002)
The Supreme Court case Hewitt v. United States (No. 23-1002) addresses the retroactive application of the First Step Act of 2018, specifically concerning sentencing for 18 U.S.C. §924(c) offenses (possession of a firearm during the commission of other crimes). The … The Supreme Court case Hewitt v. United States (No. 23-1002) addresses the retroactive application of the First Step Act of …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Safety & Crime Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Gutierrez v. Saenz (No. 23-7809)
The Supreme Court case Gutierrez v. Saenz (2025) concerns Ruben Gutierrez's attempt to obtain post-conviction DNA testing in Texas to challenge his death sentence. Gutierrez argues that Texas's DNA testing procedures violate his due process rights because they prevent him … The Supreme Court case Gutierrez v. Saenz (2025) concerns Ruben Gutierrez's attempt to obtain post-conviction DNA testing in Texas to …
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
DHS v. D.V.D. (No. 24A1153(06-23-25))
The Supreme Court granted a stay on a preliminary injunction issued by a lower court regarding the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) practice of removing non-citizens to third countries. The injunction required DHS to provide written notice and a meaningful … The Supreme Court granted a stay on a preliminary injunction issued by a lower court regarding the Department of Homeland …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (No. 23-1187)
The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge FDA decisions regarding the marketing of new tobacco products. The court held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco … The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. (No. 23-1226)
The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act and its impact on district courts' ability to review agency interpretations of statutes in enforcement proceedings. The Court held that … The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Stanley v. City of Sanford (No. 23-997)
The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects retirees from disability-based discrimination regarding retirement benefits. The Court held that to prevail under §12112(a), a plaintiff must … The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source