Presidential Actions
Bills of Congress
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 31โ€“40 of 120 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (No. 24-7)
The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge the EPA's approval of California regulations under the Clean Air Act. These regulations mandate that automakers manufacture more electric vehicles โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Stanley v. City of Sanford (No. 23-997)
The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects retirees from disability-based discrimination regarding retirement benefits. The Court held that to prevail under ยง12112(a), a plaintiff must โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization (No. 24-20)
The Supreme Court case *Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization* (2025) addresses whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) violates the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The PSJVTA allows U.S. nationals injured by international terrorism to โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization* (2025) addresses whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
United States v. Skrmetti (No. 23-477)
The Supreme Court case *United States v. Skrmetti* (2025) concerns a Tennessee law (SB1) that restricts gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors. The Court held that SB1 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *United States v. Skrmetti* (2025) concerns a Tennessee law (SB1) that restricts gender-affirming medical treatments for โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (No. 23-1229)
The Supreme Court case *EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.* (No. 23-1229) addresses the venue for judicial review of EPA actions under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The central issue is whether the EPA's denial of small refinery exemptions from โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.* (No. 23-1229) addresses the venue for judicial review of EPA โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Perttu v. Richards (No. 23-1324)
The Supreme Court case Perttu v. Richards (2025) addresses whether a party has the right to a jury trial on Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) exhaustion when the exhaustion issue is intertwined with the merits of the underlying claim. The โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case Perttu v. Richards (2025) addresses whether a party has the right to a jury trial on โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
NRC v. Texas (No. 23-1300)
The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision in *NRC v. Texas*, holding that Texas and Fasken were not entitled to judicial review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) licensing decision regarding a private off-site nuclear waste storage facility. The โ€ฆ The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision in *NRC v. Texas*, holding that Texas and Fasken were not entitled โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Oklahoma v. EPA (No. 23-1067)
The Supreme Court case *Oklahoma v. EPA* (2025) addresses the venue for challenging the EPA's disapproval of state implementation plans (SIPs) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Court held that EPA's disapprovals of Oklahoma and Utah's SIPs are locally โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Oklahoma v. EPA* (2025) addresses the venue for challenging the EPA's disapproval of state implementation plans โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Soto v. United States (No. 24-320)
The Supreme Court case *Soto v. United States* (No. 24-320) addresses whether the statute providing combat-related special compensation (CRSC) to qualifying veterans constitutes "another law" that displaces the Barring Act's default settlement procedures and its 6-year limitations period. The Court โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Soto v. United States* (No. 24-320) addresses whether the statute providing combat-related special compensation (CRSC) to โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Rivers v. Guerrero (No. 23-1345)
The Supreme Court case *Rivers v. Guerrero* addresses the classification of second or successive habeas corpus petitions under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). The Court held that once a district court enters a judgment on an initial โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Rivers v. Guerrero* addresses the classification of second or successive habeas corpus petitions under the Antiterrorism โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source