Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress Sunset Act
Summary
The "Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress Sunset Act" (S. 2765) aims to eliminate the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress by striking chapter 27 of title 44 of the United States Code. It mandates annual reports on the management and preservation of congressional records. These reports are to be submitted by the Director of the Center for Legislative Archives to various entities, including the Archivist, Secretary of the Senate, Clerk of the House, and relevant congressional committees.
Expected Effects
The Act will dissolve the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. Responsibilities for oversight and reporting on congressional records management will shift to the Director of the Center for Legislative Archives, the Archivist, the Secretary of the Senate, and the Clerk of the House, along with relevant congressional committees.
Potential Benefits
- Streamlining of responsibilities related to congressional records management.
- Increased accountability through mandatory annual reports.
- Potential for more efficient resource allocation by eliminating a redundant committee.
- Ensuring regular review and adaptation of record management practices.
- Improved transparency through reporting to key stakeholders.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Loss of specialized advisory input from the sunsetted committee.
- Potential for reduced focus on records management if new responsibilities are not adequately prioritized.
- Risk of decreased expertise in records management if the Director and other officials lack sufficient experience.
- Possible disruption during the transition period as responsibilities shift.
- Potential for less comprehensive oversight if the new reporting structure is less effective.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act appears to align with Article I, Section 1 of the US Constitution, which grants legislative powers to Congress. The management and preservation of congressional records are intrinsic to Congress's ability to function effectively. The Act does not infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).