Continuance Of Certain Federal Advisory Committees
Summary
This executive order continues the existence of various federal advisory committees until September 30, 2027. These committees cover a wide range of policy areas, from preservation of the White House to national security telecommunications and monument management. The order also designates the heads of relevant departments or agencies to perform presidential functions related to these committees, as per the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Expected Effects
The order ensures the continued operation of advisory committees, allowing them to continue providing advice and recommendations to the President and relevant agencies. This continuation maintains the existing structure for policy input and oversight in the specified areas. It supersedes a previous order from 2023, updating the extension to 2027.
Potential Benefits
- Ensures continuity in advisory functions across various sectors.
- Allows for ongoing expert input into policy decisions.
- Provides stability for committees involved in long-term projects and initiatives.
- Maintains established channels for public-private sector collaboration.
- Supports the continued operation of committees focused on cultural heritage and national monuments.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May perpetuate existing advisory structures even if they are not fully effective.
- Could limit opportunities for new perspectives or committee reforms.
- Potential for continued operational costs associated with maintaining these committees.
- Risk of advisory capture if committees are not sufficiently diverse or independent.
- Possible entrenchment of existing policy approaches, hindering innovation.
Constitutional Alignment
The executive order is issued under the President's authority as vested by the Constitution and laws of the United States, particularly citing chapter 10 of title 5, United States Code (the Federal Advisory Committee Act). This act provides the framework for establishing and managing federal advisory committees. The order does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional provision, as it primarily concerns the administrative function of seeking expert advice.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).