Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence
Summary
This National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-7) directs a national strategy to counter domestic terrorism and organized political violence. It focuses on investigating, prosecuting, and disrupting networks and individuals involved in political violence and intimidation. The memorandum emphasizes a coordinated effort among federal agencies, including the JTTFs, Department of Justice, and Department of Treasury, to address the issue.
Expected Effects
The memorandum will likely lead to increased surveillance, investigation, and prosecution of individuals and groups deemed to be engaged in domestic terrorism. It could also result in the designation of certain groups as domestic terrorist organizations. This may also lead to increased funding for law enforcement and related programs.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced public safety through the disruption of violent extremist groups.
- Protection of democratic institutions and constitutional rights from violent attacks.
- Prevention of political violence and intimidation.
- Increased accountability for individuals and organizations involved in domestic terrorism.
- Improved coordination among federal agencies in addressing domestic terrorism.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for overreach and infringement on civil liberties, particularly freedom of speech and assembly (First Amendment).
- Risk of targeting individuals and groups based on political beliefs rather than actual violence.
- Increased surveillance and potential for abuse of power.
- Erosion of trust in government and law enforcement.
- Potential for chilling effect on legitimate political dissent.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The memorandum's constitutionality is questionable. While the government has a legitimate interest in preventing violence, the broad scope of the memorandum and its focus on political violence could infringe on First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly. The potential designation of groups as domestic terrorist organizations raises due process concerns. The memorandum's alignment with the Constitution depends on how it is implemented and whether it respects constitutional limits on government power.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).