Expressing support for the recognition of September 26, 2025, as World Contraception Day and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding global and domestic access to contraception.
Summary
H. Con. Res. 53 expresses support for recognizing September 26, 2025, as World Contraception Day. It also conveys the House of Representatives' stance on global and domestic access to contraception. The resolution emphasizes contraception as a fundamental right and highlights disparities in access.
Expected Effects
The resolution aims to increase awareness and support for contraception access. It encourages Congress and the administration to take steps to ensure universal, high-quality, and affordable contraception. This could lead to policy changes and increased funding for related programs.
Potential Benefits
- Increased access to contraception, reducing unintended pregnancies and maternal deaths.
- Improved sexual and reproductive health outcomes, particularly for underserved communities.
- Advancement of women's education, career, and economic opportunities.
- Reduction in the spread of sexually transmitted infections.
- Alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for disagreement and conflict due to differing views on contraception.
- Possible challenges in implementing policies to expand access, such as funding and provider shortages.
- Concerns about the impact on religious freedom for healthcare providers who object to providing contraception.
- Risk of unintended consequences from over-the-counter availability, such as misuse or lack of counseling.
- Potential for increased government spending on contraception programs.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the constitutional right to privacy as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Baird, which established the right to contraception. It also relates to the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as access to contraception can improve public health and well-being. However, some may argue that it infringes upon religious freedom under the First Amendment if it compels individuals or institutions to provide services against their beliefs.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).