Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Department of Agriculture should use its contingency funds and interchange authority to finance the supplemental nutrition assistance program.
Summary
This House Resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) should utilize its contingency funds and interchange authority to finance the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The resolution addresses concerns about potential funding gaps and the impact on vulnerable populations who rely on SNAP benefits. It references prior congressional appropriations for the SNAP contingency fund and the USDA's authority to transfer funds within nutrition programs.
Expected Effects
If adopted, this resolution would put pressure on the USDA to use its existing funds to maintain SNAP benefits, particularly during times of potential government shutdowns or funding lapses. While the resolution itself is non-binding, it signals congressional intent and could influence the USDA's decision-making process. The resolution aims to ensure continued food assistance for millions of Americans.
Potential Benefits
- Ensures continued access to food for vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, people with disabilities, and veterans.
- Reduces the risk of hunger and malnutrition among SNAP recipients.
- Provides stability and predictability for state administrative expenses related to SNAP.
- Reinforces the government's commitment to providing a safety net for those in need.
- Potentially mitigates negative economic impacts associated with food insecurity.
Potential Disadvantages
- Using contingency funds may deplete resources intended for unforeseen emergencies or long-term needs.
- Interchange authority transfers could potentially impact other nutrition programs if funds are diverted.
- The resolution is non-binding and does not guarantee that the USDA will act as requested.
- Potential for political disagreements regarding the appropriate use of USDA funds.
- May create a precedent for relying on contingency funds for routine program operations.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the general welfare clause of the Constitution, which empowers Congress to provide for the well-being of the nation. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention food assistance programs, the resolution's intent to alleviate hunger and malnutrition can be interpreted as promoting the general welfare. The resolution does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).