Fair Artificial Intelligence Realization Act of 2025; FAIR Act
Summary
The Fair Artificial Intelligence Realization Act of 2025 (FAIR Act) aims to prohibit federal procurement of large language models (LLMs) that are not developed according to unbiased AI principles. It mandates that LLMs used by federal agencies must prioritize truthfulness, historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity. The bill also emphasizes neutrality and discourages the intentional encoding of partisan or ideological judgments into LLM outputs.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the FAIR Act would change how federal agencies acquire and use LLMs. Agencies would need to ensure that the LLMs they procure adhere to the specified principles of truthfulness, accuracy, and neutrality. This could lead to changes in the types of AI technologies the government utilizes and potentially influence the development standards for LLMs in the private sector.
Potential Benefits
- Promotes trustworthy AI by ensuring LLMs used by the government are truthful and objective.
- Encourages accuracy and scientific inquiry in AI-generated information.
- Prevents the manipulation of information by LLMs based on partisan or ideological biases.
- May lead to greater public trust in government use of AI.
- Could foster innovation in the development of unbiased AI technologies.
Potential Disadvantages
- The definition of 'unbiased AI principles' could be subjective and lead to disputes.
- The Act may limit the government's access to certain advanced LLMs if they cannot meet the specified criteria.
- Compliance with the Act could increase the cost and complexity of federal AI procurement.
- The Act might stifle innovation if developers are overly cautious to avoid perceived bias.
- There is a risk that the Act could be used to suppress legitimate viewpoints under the guise of neutrality.
Constitutional Alignment
The FAIR Act's focus on promoting truthful and objective information aligns with the First Amendment's principles of free speech and the pursuit of knowledge. However, the Act's restrictions on ideological content could potentially raise concerns about government censorship or viewpoint discrimination. The Act's impact on government procurement falls under the purview of Congress's power to regulate federal spending (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).