Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

Freedom to Heal Act of 2025

Summary

The Freedom to Heal Act of 2025 aims to establish a special registration process under the Controlled Substances Act, allowing physicians to administer Schedule I investigational drugs to eligible patients under the Federal Right to Try law. This bill amends Section 303 of the Controlled Substances Act to create a pathway for physicians to access and administer these drugs, provided they meet specific requirements and comply with guidelines set by manufacturers and the Attorney General.

The Act outlines application procedures, limitations on drug amounts, and rules for treatment sites. It also mandates the Attorney General to issue interim and final rules to implement the Act, ensuring effective controls against diversion and proper administration of the drugs.
The bill intends to streamline access to investigational drugs for patients with life-threatening conditions, while maintaining necessary regulatory oversight.

Expected Effects

The Freedom to Heal Act of 2025, if enacted, would create a new regulatory pathway for physicians to administer Schedule I investigational drugs to eligible patients under the Right to Try law. This would likely increase access to experimental treatments for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions who have exhausted other options.

It would also place new responsibilities on the Attorney General to register physicians and oversee the distribution and administration of these drugs. The Act could also spur innovation in drug development by providing a more defined route for investigational drugs to reach patients.

Potential Benefits

  • Increased Access to Investigational Drugs: Eligible patients with life-threatening conditions may gain access to potentially life-saving treatments.
  • Physician Empowerment: Physicians gain a legal framework to administer Schedule I investigational drugs, expanding their treatment options.
  • Streamlined Process: The special registration process aims to reduce bureaucratic hurdles for physicians seeking to administer these drugs.
  • Defined Regulatory Framework: The Act establishes clear rules and guidelines for the administration, storage, and security of Schedule I investigational drugs.
  • Potential for Medical Advancement: Facilitating access to investigational drugs could accelerate medical research and development.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Potential for Diversion: The Act introduces the risk of diversion of Schedule I drugs, requiring stringent oversight by the Attorney General.
  • Limited Patient Protection: While the Act references the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, concerns remain about patient safety and informed consent when using investigational drugs.
  • Administrative Burden: The Attorney General faces a significant administrative burden in establishing and managing the special registration process.
  • Uncertainty in Efficacy: The investigational drugs may not be effective and could have unforeseen side effects.
  • Potential for Unequal Access: Access to these drugs may be limited to patients with the resources to navigate the application process and secure treatment.

Constitutional Alignment

The Freedom to Heal Act of 2025 appears to align with the Constitution, particularly the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people. By establishing a framework for access to investigational drugs, the Act could be argued to promote the general welfare, as stated in the Preamble.

However, the Act's reliance on the Controlled Substances Act raises questions about the extent of federal power over healthcare, which is traditionally a state matter. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) could be invoked to justify federal regulation of drugs that cross state lines.

Furthermore, the Act must ensure due process (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments) for physicians seeking registration and patients receiving treatment. The rulemaking process outlined in the Act should comply with these constitutional requirements.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).