Government Shutdown Efficiency Act
Summary
The "Government Shutdown Efficiency Act" aims to grant the President authority to sell federal real property during government shutdowns. Funds from these sales would be used to pay excepted federal employees, with any remaining funds going towards deficit reduction or potentially the purchase of Greenland. The bill also prohibits sales to foreign adversary countries.
Expected Effects
This act could lead to a more streamlined approach to funding essential government services during shutdowns. It also introduces the possibility of significant changes in federal asset management. The bill could also impact international relations, depending on how the authority to purchase Greenland is exercised.
Potential Benefits
- Ensures excepted federal employees continue to receive pay during shutdowns.
- Potentially reduces the federal deficit through real property sales.
- Could lead to the acquisition of Greenland, expanding U.S. territory and influence.
- Prevents the sale of federal property to adversarial nations, safeguarding national interests.
- Provides a mechanism to maintain essential government functions during funding lapses.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to hasty sales of federal property at potentially undervalued prices.
- May incentivize government shutdowns as a means to generate revenue through property sales.
- The focus on Greenland acquisition could divert resources from other critical areas.
- Raises concerns about the long-term implications of selling off federal assets.
- Potential for abuse of power by the executive branch in determining which properties to sell.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is complex. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to dispose of property belonging to the United States. This bill delegates some of that power to the President during a specific circumstance. The bill's provisions regarding the use of funds and potential acquisition of Greenland fall under the President's executive powers, but could be challenged if they infringe on Congressional authority over appropriations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).