Great Lakes Fishery Research Reauthorization Act
Summary
The Great Lakes Fishery Research Reauthorization Act extends funding for monitoring, assessment, and research in the Great Lakes Basin. Specifically, it amends Section 201(d) of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, by changing the end date of authorized funding from 2025 to 2030. This ensures continued resources for understanding and managing the Great Lakes ecosystem.
The Act focuses on maintaining existing research efforts rather than initiating new programs. It reflects a commitment to the ongoing health and sustainability of the Great Lakes.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this Act is the continuation of existing research and monitoring programs in the Great Lakes Basin. This extension provides stability for researchers and organizations involved in these efforts.
It allows for continued data collection and analysis, which informs management decisions related to fisheries and the overall ecosystem health of the Great Lakes.
Potential Benefits
- Continued monitoring of fish populations and ecosystem health.
- Sustained research efforts to address emerging threats to the Great Lakes.
- Informed decision-making for fisheries management and conservation.
- Preservation of the Great Lakes ecosystem for future generations.
- Potential for improved recreational and commercial fishing opportunities.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for funding to be insufficient to address all research needs.
- Limited scope focusing on reauthorization rather than new initiatives.
- Possible lack of flexibility to adapt to unforeseen environmental changes.
- Dependence on continued congressional support for future funding.
- Potential for research findings to be ignored or misused in policy decisions.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act aligns with the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution, which allows Congress to enact laws that promote the well-being of the nation. Protecting the Great Lakes ecosystem contributes to the general welfare by ensuring access to clean water, supporting economic activities, and preserving natural resources.
Furthermore, Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to regulate commerce, which can be interpreted to include managing resources like the Great Lakes that have interstate and international significance. The Act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).