H.R.1721 - Critical Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1721, the Critical Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act, directs the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the feasibility of manufacturing products for critical infrastructure sectors within the United States. The study aims to identify high-demand imported products facing manufacturing or supply chain constraints, analyze the costs and benefits of domestic manufacturing, and determine the feasibility of manufacturing these products in the U.S., particularly in rural areas and industrial parks. The Secretary must submit a report to Congress with recommendations within 18 months of the Act's enactment.
Expected Effects
The primary effect will be a comprehensive report detailing the potential for increased domestic manufacturing in critical infrastructure sectors. This could lead to future legislation or policies aimed at incentivizing or supporting such manufacturing. The study itself will not directly create jobs or change manufacturing practices, but it will inform future decisions.
Potential Benefits
- Informed Policymaking: Provides data for informed decisions on manufacturing and supply chains.
- Job Creation Potential: Identifies opportunities for creating manufacturing jobs in the U.S.
- Economic Growth: Could lead to increased domestic manufacturing and economic activity.
- Supply Chain Security: Reduces reliance on foreign sources for critical infrastructure products.
- Rural Development: Specifically considers manufacturing in rural areas.
Potential Disadvantages
- Limited Immediate Impact: The Act only mandates a study, not direct action.
- Potential for Inaction: The study's recommendations may not be implemented.
- Cost of the Study: Conducting the study will require government resources.
- Data Collection Challenges: Gathering accurate data on manufacturing costs and feasibility can be difficult.
- No Compulsion of Information: The Secretary cannot compel information, potentially limiting the study's scope.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce and provide for the general welfare. The study's focus on manufacturing and supply chains falls under the umbrella of regulating commerce. The Act does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).