H.R.2601 - Delete DOGE Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 2601, the "Delete DOGE Act," aims to prohibit the use of federal funds for the United States DOGE Service (Department of Government Efficiency) and related entities. The bill targets the defunding of DOGE by preventing federal funds from being used to implement executive orders associated with its establishment and operation. It also restricts the use of funds for projects initiated by DOGE entities after January 20, 2025, and prohibits covered individuals from using federal funds.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the Delete DOGE Act would likely lead to the dismantling of the United States DOGE Service and associated initiatives. This would involve ceasing all funding for the department, its temporary organization, and any related teams or entities. The Act would also prevent individuals associated with DOGE from utilizing federal resources.
Potential Benefits
- Potential cost savings by eliminating funding for the DOGE Service.
- Re-direction of funds to other government programs or services.
- Prevention of potential overreach or mission creep by the DOGE Service.
- Reinforcement of existing digital service delivery methods.
- Could address concerns about the efficiency and effectiveness of the DOGE Service.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Disruption of government efficiency initiatives already in progress.
- Potential loss of expertise and resources dedicated to improving government services.
- Possible negative impact on innovation within the federal government.
- Could hinder efforts to modernize government operations.
- May lead to inefficiencies if the DOGE Service was indeed improving government processes.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Constitution primarily concerns the legislative power of Congress over appropriations, as outlined in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, which states that "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." This gives Congress the power to control federal spending. The bill also touches on the executive power, as it seeks to limit the implementation of executive orders, potentially raising questions about the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).