H.R.3525 - Regulatory Accountability Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3525, the Regulatory Accountability Act, aims to amend Title 5 of the United States Code to improve agency rulemaking processes. The bill introduces new definitions related to agency guidance and major rules, emphasizing cost-benefit analysis and public input. It seeks to enhance transparency and accountability in federal agencies' regulatory actions.
Expected Effects
The bill would change how federal agencies create and implement regulations. It would require more rigorous analysis of costs and benefits, increased public participation, and greater oversight by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced transparency in the rulemaking process through increased public access to information.
- More thorough cost-benefit analyses for major rules, potentially leading to more efficient regulations.
- Increased opportunity for public comment and input on proposed rules.
- Standardized guidelines for agencies to follow during rulemaking, promoting consistency.
- Retrospective review of major rules to ensure they continue to meet their objectives.
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased complexity and delays in the rulemaking process due to additional requirements.
- Potential for regulatory gridlock if agencies struggle to meet the new analytical burdens.
- Greater influence of OIRA, which could lead to political interference in agency decision-making.
- Increased litigation as stakeholders challenge agency compliance with the new requirements.
- Possible chilling effect on agencies' willingness to issue new regulations, even when needed.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's focus on procedural requirements for rulemaking aligns with Congress's power to legislate under Article I, Section 1. The emphasis on public notice and comment supports principles of due process, although the Constitution does not explicitly detail rulemaking procedures. The enhanced role of OIRA raises questions about the separation of powers, as it could concentrate regulatory authority within the executive branch.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).