ICE Out of Our Faces Act
Summary
The "ICE Out of Our Faces Act" aims to limit the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) use of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies. Specifically, it prohibits covered immigration officers from acquiring, possessing, accessing, or using biometric surveillance systems within the United States. The bill also mandates the deletion of previously collected biometric data within 30 days of enactment.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the bill would significantly restrict the ability of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to use facial recognition and similar technologies for immigration enforcement. This could lead to changes in how these agencies conduct investigations, monitor borders, and enforce immigration laws. It also establishes a cause of action for individuals aggrieved by violations of the Act, allowing them to sue the Federal Government.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced privacy for individuals, as biometric data collection by immigration officers would be significantly curtailed.
- Increased accountability for immigration enforcement agencies through potential civil actions and penalties for violations.
- Protection against potential biases and inaccuracies associated with facial recognition technology.
- Strengthened civil liberties by limiting government surveillance.
- Clearer legal framework regarding the use of biometric surveillance in immigration enforcement.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential reduction in the effectiveness of immigration enforcement efforts due to the limitation on biometric surveillance technologies.
- Increased difficulty in identifying and tracking individuals who may pose a national security risk.
- Possible increase in the cost and time required for immigration investigations.
- Risk of hindering efforts to combat human trafficking and other cross-border crimes.
- Potential legal challenges and debates regarding the scope and interpretation of the Act.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's focus on limiting government surveillance aligns with constitutional principles related to privacy and individual liberties, particularly the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The establishment of a cause of action for individuals aggrieved by violations of the Act reinforces due process rights, as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. However, the bill's impact on national security and border control could raise questions regarding the government's ability to fulfill its constitutional duty to provide for the common defense (Article I, Section 8).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).