ICE Out of Our Faces Act
Summary
The "ICE Out of Our Faces Act" aims to limit the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) use of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance systems by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). It prohibits covered immigration officers from acquiring, possessing, accessing, or using biometric surveillance systems or information derived from them within the United States. The bill also mandates the deletion of previously collected biometric data within 30 days of enactment.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the bill would significantly restrict the use of facial recognition and biometric surveillance by ICE and CBP. This could lead to changes in how these agencies conduct immigration enforcement and border security operations. It also establishes a cause of action for individuals aggrieved by violations of the Act, allowing them to sue the Federal Government.
Potential Benefits
- Increased privacy and reduced surveillance for individuals, particularly in immigrant communities.
- Protection against potential biases and inaccuracies in biometric surveillance systems.
- Greater accountability for government agencies regarding the use of personal data.
- Empowerment of individuals to seek legal recourse for violations of their rights.
- Potential for reduced chilling effect on free speech and assembly due to decreased surveillance.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential reduction in the effectiveness of immigration enforcement and border security efforts.
- Increased difficulty in identifying and apprehending individuals who pose a threat to national security or public safety.
- Possible increase in costs associated with alternative methods of identification and enforcement.
- Potential for legal challenges and ambiguities regarding the scope and interpretation of the Act.
- Possible impact on ongoing investigations that rely on biometric data.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's focus on limiting government surveillance aligns with constitutional principles related to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, potentially implicating the Fourth Amendment. The establishment of a cause of action for individuals whose rights are violated aligns with due process considerations under the Fifth Amendment. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states, and this bill could be seen as an exercise of federal power to regulate immigration enforcement.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).