Law Against Nefarious Drones, Enforcement, Deconfliction Act; LANDED Act
Summary
The Law Against Nefarious Drones, Enforcement, Deconfliction Act (LANDED Act) aims to establish a framework for state and federal law enforcement cooperation in detecting and mitigating threats posed by unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). It allows state law enforcement agencies, with federal approval, to acquire, deploy, and operate counter-UAS systems. The act also mandates drone deconfliction reporting and establishes a grant program for counter-UAS equipment acquisition.
Expected Effects
The LANDED Act will likely lead to increased monitoring and control of drone activity, potentially reducing the risk of unlawful drone operations. It could also create a more standardized approach to counter-UAS measures across different states. However, it may also raise concerns about privacy and potential misuse of counter-UAS technology.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced public safety through the mitigation of drone-related threats.
- Improved coordination between state and federal law enforcement agencies.
- Increased security for critical infrastructure and national security installations.
- Creation of a grant program to support state law enforcement in acquiring counter-UAS technology.
- Establishment of mandatory reporting requirements for drone operations.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for infringement on individual privacy rights through increased surveillance.
- Risk of misuse or abuse of counter-UAS technology by law enforcement.
- Possible disruption of legitimate drone operations.
- Potential for federal overreach into state law enforcement activities.
- Uncertainty regarding the long-term impact on civilian communications and technology networks.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The LANDED Act's constitutional alignment is complex. While it aims to enhance public safety and national security, potentially aligning with the Constitution's goals of ensuring domestic tranquility and providing for the common defense, it also raises concerns regarding the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The act's provisions allowing for the interception of communications used to control drones without prior consent could be subject to legal challenges based on privacy grounds. The balance between security and individual liberties will be a key factor in determining its ultimate constitutionality.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).