No Palaces Act
Summary
The "No Palaces Act" (S. 3361) aims to amend Title 40 of the United States Code, requiring the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) approval for certain improvements to the White House or its grounds. It introduces a process involving concept review, NCPC approval, and potential congressional disapproval via a joint resolution. The bill also addresses the use of private and federal funds for these improvements.
Expected Effects
This act would increase oversight of White House renovations. It mandates a more rigorous approval process involving the NCPC and potentially Congress. This could slow down or prevent certain projects from proceeding if they lack sufficient support.
Potential Benefits
- Increased transparency and public input into White House renovations.
- Ensures adherence to established planning guidelines through NCPC involvement.
- Provides a mechanism for Congress to check potential excesses in White House improvements.
- Limits the use of private funds without congressional authorization, promoting accountability.
- Expedited judicial review process for alleged violations.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential delays in necessary White House repairs or upgrades due to the approval process.
- Increased bureaucracy and administrative burden for the Executive Office of the President.
- Risk of political gridlock if Congress disagrees with proposed improvements.
- Possible chilling effect on donations if private funding is restricted.
- The expedited judicial review process could strain judicial resources.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 1, which vests legislative powers in Congress. The provision allowing Congress to disapprove proposed improvements through a joint resolution is an exercise of this power. The bill also respects the separation of powers by involving both the executive branch (Executive Office of the President) and the legislative branch (Congress) in the approval process. The rulemaking power of each house is also recognized, aligning with constitutional principles.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).