Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability.
Summary
This joint resolution aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) concerning the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), specifically related to 'Marketplace Integrity and Affordability'. The resolution seeks to nullify the rule, preventing it from taking effect. It cites chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, as the basis for congressional disapproval.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would prevent the CMS rule regarding ACA marketplace integrity and affordability from being implemented. This could lead to a continuation of existing regulations or practices in the ACA marketplace. The practical impact would depend on the specific changes the CMS rule intended to introduce.
Potential Benefits
- Prevents potential unintended consequences of the new rule.
- Allows Congress to review and potentially revise the rule.
- Maintains the status quo if the existing regulations are deemed more beneficial.
- Ensures greater congressional oversight of healthcare regulations.
- Could lead to a more carefully considered and refined rule in the future.
Potential Disadvantages
- Disrupts planned improvements or changes to the ACA marketplace.
- Creates uncertainty for insurers and consumers.
- Delays potential benefits of the new rule.
- May lead to inefficiencies if the existing regulations are less effective.
- Could be perceived as political interference in healthcare policy.
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution invokes congressional authority under chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code, which likely stems from the legislative powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution. This section vests all legislative powers in the Congress. The resolution represents an exercise of congressional oversight over executive agency rulemaking, a power implicitly recognized through statutes like the one cited.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).