S.1825 - Augmenting Research and Educational Sites to Ensure Agriculture Remains Cutting-Edge and Helpful Act; AG RESEARCH Act (119th Congress)
Summary
S.1825, the AG RESEARCH Act, aims to address deferred maintenance at agricultural research facilities by amending the Research Facilities Act. It authorizes mandatory funding of $1 billion annually from 2025-2029 and allows for additional appropriations for agricultural research facilities. The bill also emphasizes equitable distribution of funds and requires consultation with the National Institute of Food and Agriculture peer review panels during proposal evaluations.
Expected Effects
The Act will likely lead to modernization and repair of agricultural research facilities across the United States. This could enhance the quality and quantity of agricultural research. It may also improve the competitiveness of US agriculture on a global scale.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced agricultural research capabilities through modernized facilities.
- Increased funding for schools of agriculture, promoting innovation.
- Potential for job creation in construction and related industries.
- Improved food security and agricultural viability.
- Equitable distribution of funds to diverse institutions and states.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for inefficient allocation of funds if not properly managed.
- Risk of funds being disproportionately allocated to certain projects or states despite equitable distribution efforts.
- Increased federal spending, potentially contributing to the national debt.
- Possible delays in project implementation due to bureaucratic processes.
- Dependence on continued funding appropriations in future years.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act aligns with the Constitution's general welfare clause (Preamble). Congress has the power to appropriate funds for the general welfare, which includes supporting agricultural research. The Act does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).