SAFER SKIES Act
Summary
The SAFER SKIES Act expands the authority to use counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) technologies to State, local, Tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement and correctional agencies. It amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to allow these agencies to take actions against drones that pose a credible threat to public safety, critical infrastructure, or correctional facilities. The Act also establishes training and certification requirements for SLTT agencies using C-UAS technologies and mandates reporting on their activities.
Expected Effects
This act will likely lead to increased drone detection and mitigation capabilities at the state and local levels. It could also result in enhanced security for public gatherings, critical infrastructure, and correctional facilities. However, it may raise concerns about potential misuse of C-UAS technologies and the impact on individual privacy.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced security at large public gatherings and events.
- Improved protection of critical infrastructure from potential drone threats.
- Increased ability of law enforcement to counter the use of drones for illegal activities, such as smuggling contraband into prisons.
- Standardization of training and certification for state and local law enforcement agencies using counter-UAS technologies.
- Establishment of a reimbursement program for federal agencies providing counter-UAS protection to non-federal events.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for misuse of counter-UAS technologies by state and local law enforcement agencies.
- Possible infringements on individual privacy rights due to expanded surveillance capabilities.
- Risk of accidental disruption of legitimate drone operations.
- Increased costs for training, certification, and equipment for state and local law enforcement agencies.
- Potential for civil liability if counter-UAS actions are not properly executed.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The SAFER SKIES Act raises potential Fourth Amendment concerns regarding unreasonable searches and seizures, as the use of counter-UAS technologies could involve surveillance and disruption of drone operations. However, the Act attempts to address these concerns by requiring training and certification for law enforcement agencies and establishing oversight mechanisms. The Act's focus on protecting public safety and critical infrastructure aligns with the government's responsibility to provide for the common defense and ensure domestic tranquility, as outlined in the Preamble of the Constitution.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).