Expressing support for the Japanese Diet’s Caucus for Universal Values in the Indo-Pacific and for continued United States-Japan interparliamentary collaboration to advance democracy in the region.
Summary
House Resolution 653 expresses support for the Japanese Diet's Caucus for Universal Values in the Indo-Pacific and continued United States-Japan interparliamentary collaboration to advance democracy in the region. The resolution recognizes the shared commitment of the United States and Japan to democratic principles. It also acknowledges Japan's role in supporting democratic governance and institutions in the Indo-Pacific and worldwide.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would formally commend the establishment of the Caucus for Universal Values and encourage expanded collaboration between the United States Congress and the Japanese Diet. This collaboration aims to support emerging and challenged democracies and reinforce democratic institutions globally. The resolution also seeks greater bilateral coordination on initiatives that strengthen democratic governance and resilience against authoritarian threats.
Potential Benefits
- Strengthened diplomatic ties with Japan, a key ally in the Indo-Pacific region.
- Enhanced support for democratic values and institutions globally.
- Increased collaboration between the U.S. Congress and the Japanese Diet.
- Promotion of human rights, freedom of expression, and fair elections.
- Reinforcement of democratic governance and resilience against authoritarian threats.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased involvement in international affairs, which could strain resources.
- Risk of alienating nations that do not share the same democratic values.
- Possible backlash from authoritarian regimes.
- Limited direct impact on domestic issues within the United States.
- The resolution is non-binding, so its impact depends on subsequent actions.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the principles of promoting the general welfare and securing the blessings of liberty, as stated in the Preamble of the US Constitution. While the Constitution primarily focuses on domestic governance, it does not explicitly prohibit supporting democratic values internationally. The House's role in foreign affairs is implicitly recognized through its power to declare war and ratify treaties (Article I, Section 8).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).