H.J.Res.23 - Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security relating to Increase of the Automatic Extension Period of Employment Authorization and Documentation for Certain Employment Authorization Document Renewal Applicants. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.J. Res. 23 aims to disapprove a rule by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that increases the automatic extension period for employment authorization and documentation for certain Employment Authorization Document (EAD) renewal applicants. The resolution seeks to nullify the DHS rule, preventing it from taking effect. The joint resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 16, 2025, and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.J. Res. 23 would prevent the DHS rule from increasing the automatic extension period for EAD renewals. This would mean that individuals awaiting EAD renewal might face gaps in their employment authorization. The practical effect would be to revert to the previous extension policy, potentially causing disruptions for both employers and employees.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces strain on government resources by avoiding extended processing times.
- May ensure stricter compliance with existing immigration laws.
- Could create more job opportunities for US citizens and legal permanent residents.
- May address concerns about potential fraud or abuse related to extended work authorizations.
- Could lead to a more predictable and consistent immigration enforcement environment.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to disruptions in the workforce, particularly in industries relying on foreign workers.
- May increase the risk of individuals losing their jobs while awaiting EAD renewal.
- Could create additional administrative burdens for employers who need to verify employment eligibility.
- May negatively impact the economy by reducing the availability of skilled labor.
- Could increase the number of individuals working without proper authorization, leading to potential legal issues.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's constitutional alignment stems from Congress's legislative powers as outlined in Article I, Section 1, which vests all legislative powers in the Congress. Congress has the authority to review and disapprove rules submitted by executive agencies like the Department of Homeland Security. This oversight function ensures that executive actions align with legislative intent and statutory authority. The resolution does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or liberties.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).