H.J.Res.43 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels). (119th Congress)
Summary
H.J.Res.43 is a joint resolution introduced in the House of Representatives aiming to disapprove a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels, including petroleum liquid storage vessels. The resolution seeks to nullify the EPA rule, which was published in the Federal Register on October 15, 2024. The resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act, allowing Congress to overturn agency regulations.
If passed, this resolution would prevent the EPA's rule from taking effect. This action reflects a congressional effort to check the regulatory authority of the EPA.
The resolution was submitted by Mr. Clyde and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of H.J.Res.43, if enacted, would be to invalidate the EPA's rule regarding New Source Performance Standards for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels. This would mean that the regulations outlined in the rule would not be enforced.
Businesses operating storage vessels would not be subject to the requirements of the disapproved rule. This could potentially lead to continued emissions of volatile organic compounds at levels that the EPA sought to regulate.
Ultimately, the resolution represents a rollback of environmental regulations.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced Regulatory Burden: Businesses, particularly those in the petroleum industry, would face fewer compliance costs and administrative burdens associated with the EPA rule.
- Potential for Increased Production: Without the new standards, companies might be able to maintain or increase production levels without incurring additional expenses for emissions control.
- Congressional Oversight: The resolution affirms Congress's role in overseeing and checking the power of executive agencies like the EPA.
- Economic benefits: Reduced compliance costs could translate to lower prices for consumers.
- Flexibility for Businesses: Companies retain flexibility in how they manage emissions, potentially allowing for more cost-effective solutions.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Environmental Impact: Disapproving the rule could lead to higher emissions of volatile organic compounds, contributing to air pollution and potential health problems.
- Public Health Concerns: Increased emissions could negatively impact public health, particularly in communities near storage facilities.
- Climate Change: Volatile organic compounds contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone, a greenhouse gas, potentially exacerbating climate change.
- Undermining Environmental Regulations: Disapproving the rule could set a precedent for weakening environmental regulations and limiting the EPA's authority.
- Damage to International Standing: Undermining environmental regulations can damage the US's international standing on climate action.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's constitutional alignment stems from Article I, Section 1, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. The Congressional Review Act, under which this resolution is filed, is a mechanism for Congress to review and potentially disapprove regulations issued by federal agencies, ensuring that agencies do not overstep their delegated authority.
By disapproving the EPA rule, Congress is exercising its legislative power to check the executive branch and ensure that regulations align with congressional intent. This action does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or freedoms.
However, the long-term implications for environmental protection and public health could raise questions about the government's responsibility to promote the general welfare, as stated in the Preamble.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).