H.J.Res.54 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights protected and extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.J.Res.54 proposes a constitutional amendment to limit the rights protected by the Constitution to natural persons only, excluding artificial entities like corporations. It aims to regulate campaign finance by allowing governments to limit contributions and expenditures, and clarifies that spending money to influence elections is not protected speech under the First Amendment. The amendment also explicitly states that it should not abridge the freedom of the press.
Expected Effects
If ratified, this amendment would significantly alter the legal landscape for corporations and campaign finance. Corporations would lose constitutional rights, becoming subject to greater regulation. Campaign finance laws could be strengthened, potentially reducing the influence of money in elections.
Potential Benefits
- Reduces corporate influence in politics.
- Empowers individuals in the political process.
- Allows for campaign finance reform.
- Clarifies the role of money in elections.
- Promotes a more equitable political landscape.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could harm business innovation and growth.
- May lead to unintended consequences for corporate social responsibility.
- Potential for increased government regulation of businesses.
- Possible legal challenges regarding the definition of 'natural persons'.
- Could negatively impact the economy.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The proposed amendment seeks to redefine the scope of constitutional rights, potentially conflicting with existing interpretations of the First Amendment regarding free speech and corporate personhood. The amendment's allowance for regulating campaign finance aims to address concerns about undue influence, but could also be seen as infringing on free speech rights. The explicit protection of freedom of the press aligns with the First Amendment.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).