H.J.Res.60 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.J.Res.60 is a joint resolution passed by the US Congress to disapprove a rule submitted by the National Park Service (NPS) concerning motor vehicle usage within the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The rule in question is identified as ``Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles'' (90 Fed. Reg. 2621). The resolution aims to nullify this specific NPS rule.
By disapproving the rule, Congress is exercising its oversight authority over executive branch agencies. This action prevents the rule from taking effect or continuing to be enforced.
The resolution was passed during the first session of the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of H.J.Res.60 is that the specific rule concerning motor vehicles in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, as submitted by the National Park Service, will not be enforced. This means that the regulations regarding motor vehicle use in that area will revert to the previous state before the disapproved rule was introduced.
Stakeholders affected by the rule, such as visitors, local communities, and environmental groups, will experience the consequences of the rule's nullification. The long-term impact will depend on whether the NPS proposes a revised rule or operates under existing regulations.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces restrictions on motor vehicle access for visitors, enhancing recreational opportunities.
- May address concerns raised by local communities or interest groups regarding the initial rule's impact.
- Could lead to a re-evaluation of motor vehicle management strategies in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, potentially resulting in a more balanced approach.
- Reinforces congressional oversight of executive agency regulations, ensuring accountability.
- May lead to increased tourism revenue if access is expanded.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to increased environmental impact due to fewer restrictions on motor vehicle use.
- May negatively affect the visitor experience for those who prefer quieter, less motorized areas.
- Could create uncertainty for visitors and local businesses if the regulations are unclear or subject to change.
- May require the National Park Service to expend resources to develop and implement alternative management strategies.
- Potential for increased conflict among different user groups with competing interests in the recreation area.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution aligns with the principle of separation of powers, as outlined in Article I, Section 1 of the US Constitution, which vests legislative powers in Congress. The Congressional Review Act, under which this resolution is enacted, provides a mechanism for Congress to review and disapprove agency rules, ensuring that executive agencies do not overstep their authority.
By disapproving the NPS rule, Congress is exercising its constitutional power to legislate and oversee the implementation of laws. This action does not appear to infringe upon any specific individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments.
The resolution itself is a legislative act, and its passage reflects the bicameralism requirement of Article I, requiring approval by both the House and Senate.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).