H.J.Res.60 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.J.Res.60 is a joint resolution introduced in the House of Representatives aiming to disapprove a rule submitted by the National Park Service (NPS) concerning motor vehicle usage within the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The resolution seeks to nullify the NPS rule, which is published in the Federal Register (90 Fed. Reg. 2621). If passed, the rule would have no force or effect.
The resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA), codified in chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, which allows Congress to review and potentially overturn agency regulations.
The bill was introduced by Ms. Maloy and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Expected Effects
If H.J.Res.60 is enacted, the specific NPS rule regarding motor vehicles in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (as detailed in 90 Fed. Reg. 2621) will be invalidated. This would likely result in the continuation of the previous regulations or lack thereof concerning motor vehicle use in the area.
The practical effect depends on the content of the disapproved rule. It could affect recreational access, environmental protection measures, or resource management strategies within the recreation area.
Potential Benefits
- Could reduce restrictions on motor vehicle use, potentially increasing access for visitors who rely on such vehicles.
- May address concerns from local communities or stakeholders who believe the rule negatively impacts their activities or livelihoods.
- Could prevent unintended consequences or burdens associated with the implementation of the rule.
- Could align motor vehicle regulations with local preferences or historical practices.
- Could streamline recreational activities for some visitors.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could weaken environmental protections within the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, potentially leading to habitat degradation or increased pollution.
- May negatively impact the experience of visitors who prefer a more natural or less motorized environment.
- Could undermine the authority of the National Park Service to manage resources effectively.
- May lead to increased conflicts between different user groups (e.g., motorized vs. non-motorized recreation).
- Could reverse progress towards sustainable recreation practices.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's constitutional alignment stems from Article I, Section 1, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. This includes the power to oversee and check the actions of the Executive branch agencies like the National Park Service.
The Congressional Review Act, under which this resolution is filed, is a mechanism by which Congress exercises its oversight authority. It allows Congress to disapprove of agency rules that it deems inconsistent with its legislative intent or the public interest.
Furthermore, the resolution does not appear to infringe upon any specific individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).