H.J.Res.81 - Authorizing the use of military force against certain Mexican cartels. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.J.Res.81 proposes authorizing the President to use military force against specific Mexican cartels, including Tren de Aragua, MS-13, Sinaloa Cartel, Jalisco New Generation Cartel, Northeast Cartel, Michoacan family, United Cartels, Cartel del Golfo, and Clan del Golfo. The resolution cites these cartels' involvement in terrorism, violence against Americans, drug smuggling, human trafficking, and violation of U.S. sovereignty. It argues that the Mexican government has been unable or unwilling to dismantle these cartels.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would grant the President broad authority to deploy the U.S. military against the named cartels. This could lead to military operations within Mexico, potentially impacting U.S.-Mexico relations and regional stability. The resolution also invokes the War Powers Resolution, requiring Congressional oversight of any military action.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced drug trafficking and opioid deaths in the United States.
- Disruption of human trafficking networks.
- Increased national security by addressing threats from cartels operating near the border.
- Protection of American citizens from cartel-related violence.
- Demonstration of U.S. resolve to combat transnational criminal organizations.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for escalating conflict and destabilizing Mexico.
- Risk of civilian casualties and human rights violations.
- Damage to U.S.-Mexico relations and cooperation on other issues.
- Legal and ethical concerns about military intervention in another country.
- Unintended consequences and potential for the cartels to adapt and become more dangerous.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution cites Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to provide for the common defense and general welfare. However, the constitutionality of using military force against non-state actors within another sovereign nation is debatable. The resolution attempts to comply with the War Powers Resolution, acknowledging the need for Congressional authorization. However, the scope of the authorization and its potential impact on international law raise constitutional questions.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).