H.R.1061 - Protecting Sensitive Locations Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1061, the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, aims to amend Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The bill seeks to limit immigration enforcement actions at sensitive locations such as schools, hospitals, and places of worship. It also clarifies the powers of immigration officers at these locations, establishing guidelines and reporting requirements for enforcement actions.
Expected Effects
The bill would restrict immigration enforcement activities within 1,000 feet of designated sensitive locations, requiring officers to cease actions unless exigent circumstances exist. It mandates training for immigration enforcement personnel and requires detailed reporting of enforcement actions at sensitive locations to oversight bodies. This could lead to fewer immigration arrests at sensitive locations.
Potential Benefits
- Increased access to essential services (healthcare, education, etc.) for immigrant communities.
- Reduced fear and anxiety among vulnerable populations regarding potential immigration enforcement.
- Greater community trust in public institutions located near sensitive locations.
- Enhanced protection for sensitive locations from disruption due to immigration enforcement activities.
- Increased accountability and oversight of immigration enforcement actions.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased criminal activity near sensitive locations due to reduced enforcement.
- Possible challenges in enforcing immigration laws effectively in areas surrounding sensitive locations.
- Increased administrative burden on immigration enforcement agencies due to reporting requirements.
- Potential for exploitation of the law by individuals seeking to avoid immigration enforcement.
- Concerns from law enforcement about limitations on their ability to respond to exigent circumstances.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. It touches on issues related to the Fourth Amendment (protection against unreasonable searches and seizures) and the Fifth Amendment (due process). By limiting enforcement actions at sensitive locations, the bill could be seen as strengthening protections for individuals, aligning with constitutional principles of due process and equal protection. However, some may argue that it infringes on the Executive Branch's authority to enforce immigration laws, potentially raising separation of powers concerns under Article II.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).