H.R.1098 - To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1098 aims to reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994. The bill modifies the definition of 'State' within the Act and increases the authorized appropriations for the program. Specifically, it raises the funding limits for both general program activities and specific award categories, extending the authorization period from 2006-2010 to 2025-2031.
Expected Effects
The reauthorization will likely lead to continued funding for the Junior Duck Stamp program, supporting conservation education through art. The increased appropriations may allow for expanded program reach and enhanced activities. This could also lead to increased awareness and engagement in wildlife conservation among young people.
Potential Benefits
- Continued support for conservation education through artistic expression.
- Increased funding for program activities and awards.
- Expanded reach of the program to more students and communities.
- Promotion of wildlife conservation awareness among youth.
- Potential for enhanced educational resources and opportunities.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased government spending, potentially contributing to the national debt.
- Limited direct economic impact beyond the program itself.
- Potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies in program administration.
- The benefits are primarily focused on a specific niche (conservation education through art), rather than broad societal improvements.
- Opportunity cost: the funds could be used for other conservation or educational programs.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the General Welfare Clause (Article I, Section 8) of the Constitution, as it promotes education and conservation, which can be argued to contribute to the general well-being of the nation. Congress has the power to appropriate funds for programs it deems beneficial. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).