H.R.1120 - Abolish the Fogarty International Center Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1120, the "Abolish the Fogarty International Center Act of 2025," proposes to eliminate the John E. Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study in the Health Sciences. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Gill of Texas, along with several co-sponsors, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. The Act consists of two sections: a short title and the abolishment of the Fogarty International Center.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the Fogarty International Center would cease to exist. This would likely result in the termination of its programs, research grants, and international collaborations in health sciences. The impact would be felt by researchers, institutions, and international partners involved with the center's activities.
Potential Benefits
- Potential cost savings to taxpayers by eliminating the center's budget.
- Resources could be reallocated to other health-related programs or initiatives deemed more effective.
- May streamline research funding processes if the center's functions are absorbed by other NIH institutes.
- Could address concerns about the center's efficiency or relevance if such concerns exist.
- Opportunity to re-evaluate and prioritize international health research efforts.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Loss of a dedicated center for international health research, potentially hindering global health initiatives.
- Disruption of ongoing research projects and collaborations supported by the center.
- Potential negative impact on U.S. leadership in global health research and training.
- Loss of expertise and resources concentrated within the Fogarty International Center.
- Possible reduction in funding for specific areas of international health research that the center prioritizes.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to fall within the legislative powers granted to Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which provides for the general welfare and the power to appropriate funds for government programs. The decision to abolish a specific center falls under Congress's authority to manage and organize government entities. No specific constitutional conflicts are immediately apparent.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).