H.R.1134 - Embassy Construction Integrity Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1134, the Embassy Construction Integrity Act of 2025, aims to prevent the U.S. Department of State from acquiring or leasing consular or diplomatic posts that were built or are owned by entities controlled by the Government of the People's Republic of China. The bill requires the Secretary of State to avoid or minimize such acquisitions or leases. It also mandates notification to relevant congressional committees when inconsistent actions are taken, especially if they are deemed to be in the national security interest.
The bill defines key terms such as "covered building," "covered construction," and "covered entity" to clarify the scope of the restrictions. The legislation seeks to address potential national security vulnerabilities associated with Chinese government involvement in the construction or ownership of U.S. diplomatic facilities.
Ultimately, the bill intends to safeguard U.S. interests by limiting Chinese influence over U.S. diplomatic infrastructure.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to restrict the State Department's options when selecting locations for embassies and consulates. It will likely increase scrutiny and due diligence processes related to construction and ownership of diplomatic facilities.
It could also lead to increased costs and delays in establishing or maintaining diplomatic posts if suitable alternatives are not readily available. The bill may also strain diplomatic relations with China if perceived as an act of distrust or economic protectionism.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced national security by reducing potential espionage or surveillance risks.
- Greater control over the integrity and security of U.S. diplomatic facilities.
- Reduced reliance on foreign entities that may have conflicting interests.
- Increased transparency in the selection and construction of diplomatic posts.
- Potential for promoting U.S. construction and engineering firms.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased costs and delays in acquiring or leasing diplomatic facilities.
- Limited flexibility in selecting optimal locations for embassies and consulates.
- Possible strain on diplomatic relations with China.
- Potential for retaliatory measures from China affecting U.S. interests abroad.
- Increased administrative burden on the Department of State.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the U.S. Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. The bill's focus on national security and preventing potential foreign influence in U.S. diplomatic facilities falls within the scope of these powers.
There are no apparent violations of individual liberties or rights as defined in the Bill of Rights. The bill does not infringe upon freedom of speech, religion, or other protected rights.
However, the implementation of the bill should be carefully monitored to ensure it does not lead to discriminatory practices or undue restrictions on international trade and relations, which could raise constitutional concerns related to equal protection and due process.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).