H.R.1166 - Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1166, the "Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act," aims to prohibit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from procuring batteries produced by specific foreign entities, primarily those linked to China, starting October 1, 2027. The bill outlines specific companies and entities subject to the prohibition, including subsidiaries and successors. Waivers are permitted under certain conditions, such as if the batteries do not pose a national security risk or are solely for research purposes, subject to Congressional notification.
Expected Effects
The Act will likely force DHS to diversify its battery supply chain, potentially increasing costs and administrative burden in the short term. It could also stimulate domestic battery production and innovation. The long-term effect is intended to reduce reliance on foreign adversaries for critical components.
Potential Benefits
- Strengthens national security by reducing dependence on potentially hostile foreign suppliers.
- May incentivize domestic battery manufacturing and technological innovation.
- Reduces the risk of forced labor in the supply chain.
- Enhances supply chain security for critical infrastructure and government operations.
- Could lead to more resilient and diversified supply chains.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential increase in procurement costs for DHS.
- Possible delays in acquiring necessary batteries if domestic alternatives are not readily available.
- May strain diplomatic relations with the countries of the listed entities.
- Could limit access to certain battery technologies if waivers are not granted.
- Requires DHS to dedicate resources to monitoring and enforcing compliance.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the constitutional mandate to provide for the common defense (Article I, Section 8). Congress has the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The Act does not appear to infringe on individual rights or freedoms protected by the Bill of Rights. The Act gives the Secretary of Homeland Security waiver authority, which is a common practice, and requires reporting to Congress, maintaining checks and balances.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).