H.R.1174 - Ensuring Distance Education Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1174, the "Ensuring Distance Education Act," proposes an amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965. The bill aims to modify the 90/10 rule applicable to proprietary institutions of higher education. Specifically, it seeks to allow non-federal revenue generated through certain distance education programs to be counted towards meeting the non-federal revenue requirements.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R. 1174 would change how proprietary institutions calculate their compliance with the 90/10 rule. This could lead to increased enrollment in distance education programs at these institutions. It may also affect the financial stability and oversight of these institutions.
Potential Benefits
- Increased access to higher education through distance learning programs.
- Potential for proprietary institutions to become more financially stable by accessing a broader revenue base.
- Could incentivize innovation in distance education program offerings.
- May reduce the reliance of proprietary institutions on federal funding.
- Could lead to lower tuition costs for some students if institutions become more efficient.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for exploitation of the amended rule by institutions seeking to maximize profits.
- Risk of reduced quality in distance education programs if institutions prioritize enrollment over educational standards.
- May lead to increased debt for students if institutions are not properly regulated.
- Could create an uneven playing field between proprietary and non-profit institutions.
- Potential for decreased oversight and accountability of proprietary institutions.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the general welfare clause of the Constitution (Preamble), as it aims to improve access to education. However, the Constitution does not explicitly address the regulation of higher education or the financial structures of proprietary institutions. The power to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8) could be interpreted to grant Congress the authority to regulate these institutions, especially if they operate across state lines.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).