H.R.1186 - Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophilic Robots Act 2.0; CREEPER Act 2.0 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1186, the CREEPER Act 2.0, aims to amend Title 18 of the United States Code to prohibit the importation, transportation, and trafficking of child sex dolls. The bill cites findings that link these dolls to child pornography and abuse, arguing they normalize submissiveness and sex between adults and minors. It seeks to criminalize the buying, selling, delivering, distributing, and possession of child sex dolls, with penalties including fines and imprisonment.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the CREEPER Act 2.0 would make it illegal to import, transport, or traffic child sex dolls in the United States. This would likely reduce the availability of these items and potentially deter individuals from engaging in activities related to child exploitation. The bill also aims to send a strong message condemning the objectification and abuse of minors.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces child exploitation and abuse by limiting access to items that normalize such behavior.
- Strengthens existing laws against child pornography and sexual abuse.
- Sends a clear message that the exploitation of minors is unacceptable.
- May help prevent individuals from progressing to actual child abuse.
- Could contribute to a safer environment for children.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for overly broad interpretation of what constitutes a 'child sex doll'.
- May not address the root causes of child exploitation and abuse.
- Could lead to increased black market activity for these items.
- Enforcement challenges in identifying and prosecuting offenders.
- Possible concerns about government overreach into personal lives.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Constitution is complex. While Congress has broad power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce (Article I, Section 8), concerns could arise regarding the First Amendment if the definition of 'child sex doll' is overly broad and infringes on protected forms of expression. The bill's focus on preventing child exploitation aligns with the government's responsibility to protect vulnerable populations, but the specific means employed must be carefully scrutinized to avoid infringing on constitutional rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).