H.R.120 - No Mandates Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.120, the "No Mandates Act," seeks to prohibit COVID-19 vaccination mandates at the federal level. It prevents federal agencies from requiring COVID-19 vaccinations and restricts the requirement of proof of vaccination for accessing federal properties and services. The bill also places restrictions on federal funding for entities that mandate COVID-19 vaccinations.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.120 would eliminate COVID-19 vaccination mandates imposed by federal agencies and entities receiving federal funds. This could lead to changes in workplace policies, access to services, and the overall approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill aims to provide individuals with greater autonomy over their healthcare decisions.
Potential Benefits
- Protects individual choice regarding COVID-19 vaccination.
- Prevents potential discrimination based on vaccination status for access to federal services and properties.
- Reduces potential burdens on individuals who may face job loss or restricted access due to vaccine mandates.
- Reinforces the principle of bodily autonomy and medical freedom.
- Could lead to increased trust in government by respecting individual healthcare decisions.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May hinder efforts to control the spread of COVID-19, potentially leading to increased cases and hospitalizations.
- Could undermine public health recommendations and scientific consensus on the effectiveness of vaccines.
- May create disparities in workplace safety and public health outcomes.
- Could complicate the operations of federal agencies and contractors who rely on vaccination to ensure a safe working environment.
- May reduce the effectiveness of public health measures during future pandemics.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. Proponents may argue it aligns with individual liberties, potentially referencing the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, which reserve rights and powers to the people and the states, respectively. Opponents might argue that the bill infringes upon the government's power to protect public health, potentially referencing the general welfare clause (Article I, Section 8) which implies the power to enact laws for the health and safety of the population. The Commerce Clause could also be invoked, arguing that vaccine mandates affect interstate commerce by influencing workforce participation and economic activity.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).