Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

H.R.1204 - Sue Victimizers and Offenders who Yield Explicit Unconsented Recordings Surreptitiously Act; Sue VOYEURS Act (119th Congress)

Summary

H.R.1204, the "Sue VOYEURS Act," introduces a civil right of action for individuals affected by video voyeurism. It allows victims of surreptitiously captured intimate visual depictions to sue the offenders in federal court. The bill defines key terms like "intimate visual depiction," "capture," and "consent" to clarify the scope of the law.

Expected Effects

The primary effect of this bill would be to empower individuals to seek legal recourse against those who capture and disseminate intimate images without consent. This could deter such behavior and provide compensation to victims. The bill also specifies exceptions, such as actions by law enforcement with a warrant.

Potential Benefits

  • Provides a legal avenue for victims of video voyeurism to seek justice and compensation.
  • Deters the act of capturing and disseminating intimate images without consent.
  • Offers a clear definition of terms related to privacy and consent in the context of image capture.
  • Allows for injunctive relief to prevent further display or disclosure of the images.
  • Protects the anonymity of plaintiffs through the use of pseudonyms in court proceedings.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Potential for misuse of the law through frivolous lawsuits.
  • Difficulty in proving lack of consent in certain situations.
  • Possible chilling effect on legitimate activities involving image capture.
  • The exception for law enforcement could be seen as a loophole if not carefully monitored.
  • The financial burden of litigation could still be a barrier for some victims.

Constitutional Alignment

The bill aligns with the principles of individual liberty and privacy, though the Constitution does not explicitly address these issues in the context of image capture. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) is invoked through the bill's requirement that the conduct involve interstate commerce. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).