H.R.1311 - Stop the Delta Tunnel Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1311, the "Stop the Delta Tunnel Act," aims to prohibit the Corps of Engineers from issuing a permit for the Delta Conveyance Project. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 13, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The Delta Conveyance Project is described in the Corps of Engineers' Draft Environmental Impact Statement from December 2022.
The bill specifically targets Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), which relates to permits for dredging or filling in navigable waters. The Act seeks to prevent the construction of the Delta Conveyance Project, often referred to as the Delta Tunnel.
This legislation reflects concerns about the environmental and economic impacts of the Delta Conveyance Project, particularly in California.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R. 1311 would prevent the Delta Conveyance Project from moving forward, as it would block the necessary permit from the Corps of Engineers. This could lead to a re-evaluation of water management strategies in California.
Stakeholders who support the Delta Conveyance Project would likely seek alternative solutions or challenge the law. The long-term effects would depend on the subsequent actions taken by state and federal agencies.
Potential Benefits
- Environmental Protection: Prevents potential ecological damage to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
- Water Rights: Protects existing water rights and allocations for communities and agriculture.
- Economic Stability: Avoids potential economic disruptions associated with the construction and operation of the tunnel.
- Community Preservation: Preserves the character and livelihoods of communities dependent on the Delta ecosystem.
- Reduced Uncertainty: Provides clarity and certainty regarding the future of water management in the region.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Water Supply Concerns: May exacerbate water scarcity issues in Southern California, especially during droughts.
- Infrastructure Development: Hinders potential improvements to water infrastructure that could enhance water delivery efficiency.
- Economic Impact: Could negatively impact industries and communities that rely on a stable water supply from the Delta.
- Missed Opportunities: Prevents the implementation of a project designed to improve water management and reduce reliance on surface water.
- Legal Challenges: May lead to legal battles and prolonged uncertainty regarding water management strategies.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment primarily relates to the balance of power between the federal government and the states, as well as the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8). Congress has the power to regulate navigable waters, but states also have rights regarding water management within their borders.
The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments. The core issue revolves around environmental regulation and infrastructure development, which fall under the purview of congressional authority.
However, the long-term effects on water rights and resource allocation could potentially raise constitutional questions if they disproportionately impact certain states or communities.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).