H.R.1485 - Alien Removal Not Resort Stays Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1485, the "Alien Removal Not Resort Stays Act," aims to terminate the Shelter and Services Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It redirects the program's funding to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for enforcement, detention, and removal operations. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 21, 2025, and referred to the Committees on Financial Services and Appropriations.
Expected Effects
The immediate effect would be the cessation of FEMA's Shelter and Services Program. Funds previously allocated to this program would be re-allocated to ICE. This shift in funding priorities would likely lead to increased immigration enforcement activities.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces the financial burden on FEMA related to the Shelter and Services Program.
- May lead to more resources for ICE to carry out enforcement, detention, and removal operations.
- Could be seen as a deterrent to illegal immigration, according to proponents.
- May align with the priorities of those who believe in stricter immigration control.
- Potentially frees up FEMA resources for other disaster relief efforts.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could negatively impact communities and organizations that rely on the Shelter and Services Program for support.
- May lead to increased strain on ICE resources and facilities.
- Could face legal challenges based on humanitarian concerns.
- May be perceived as inhumane or discriminatory towards immigrants.
- Potential disruption of services currently provided by the Shelter and Services Program.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. Congress has the power to allocate funds as it sees fit (Article I, Section 8). However, the potential impact on due process and equal protection under the law (Amendments V and XIV) could raise constitutional concerns if the enforcement actions resulting from the funding shift are perceived as unjust or discriminatory. The bill itself does not violate any specific constitutional provision, but its implementation could potentially lead to constitutional challenges.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).