H.R.1564 - Ethan's Law (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1564, also known as Ethan's Law, aims to amend Title 18 of the United States Code to mandate the safe storage of firearms. The bill seeks to prevent unauthorized access to firearms, particularly by minors and individuals legally prohibited from possessing them. It also establishes a grant program to assist states and Indian tribes in implementing similar safe storage laws.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of Ethan's Law is an increase in the secure storage of firearms across the United States. This could lead to a reduction in unintentional shootings, suicides, and gun violence involving stolen firearms. The grant program would incentivize states and tribes to adopt and enforce safe storage practices.
Potential Benefits
- Reduction in unintentional firearm injuries and deaths, especially among children.
- Decreased risk of firearm theft and subsequent use in violent crimes.
- Enhanced public safety by preventing access to firearms by individuals prohibited from possessing them.
- Support for state and tribal efforts to promote responsible gun ownership.
- Potential for decreased rates of youth suicide attempts involving firearms.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for infringing on Second Amendment rights if storage requirements are overly restrictive.
- Concerns about the cost and practicality of implementing and enforcing the safe storage requirements.
- Possible resistance from gun owners who believe the law infringes on their personal freedoms.
- Risk of creating a burden on law-abiding citizens while failing to deter criminals.
- Potential for legal challenges based on constitutional grounds.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. Proponents argue it falls under Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8) due to the movement of firearms across state lines and its impact on the national economy. However, opponents may argue that it infringes upon the Second Amendment right to bear arms. The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment, particularly regarding reasonable restrictions, would likely determine the law's constitutionality.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).