H.R.1587 - Protecting International Pipelines for Energy Security Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1587, the "Protecting International Pipelines for Energy Security Act," aims to prevent the President from unilaterally revoking Presidential permits related to cross-border energy facilities. Specifically, it requires an Act of Congress to authorize any revocation of permits for the construction, operation, or maintenance of oil, natural gas pipelines, or electric transmission facilities at international borders. The bill references several Executive Orders under which such permits are currently issued.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would significantly limit the President's power over international energy infrastructure projects. It would shift the authority to revoke permits from the executive branch to the legislative branch, requiring congressional approval for any such action. This could lead to greater stability for energy companies investing in cross-border projects but also make it more difficult to respond quickly to environmental or security concerns.
Potential Benefits
- Increased Energy Security: By preventing abrupt permit revocations, the bill aims to ensure a stable supply of energy resources.
- Investment Certainty: Energy companies may be more willing to invest in cross-border infrastructure projects if they are protected from unilateral executive action.
- Congressional Oversight: The bill enhances the role of Congress in overseeing energy infrastructure projects, promoting a more balanced approach to energy policy.
- Reduced Political Risk: The requirement for congressional approval could insulate energy projects from short-term political considerations.
- Economic Growth: Supporting energy infrastructure projects can lead to job creation and economic activity.
Potential Disadvantages
- Reduced Executive Flexibility: The bill limits the President's ability to respond quickly to environmental or security threats posed by cross-border energy facilities.
- Potential for Political Gridlock: Requiring congressional approval for permit revocations could lead to delays or inaction due to political disagreements.
- Environmental Risks: By making it more difficult to revoke permits, the bill could increase the risk of environmental damage from poorly designed or operated facilities.
- Reduced Accountability: Shifting authority to Congress could diffuse accountability for decisions related to energy infrastructure.
- Increased Lobbying: The bill could incentivize increased lobbying efforts by energy companies seeking to protect their investments.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill raises questions regarding the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. While Congress has the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8), the President also has significant authority in foreign affairs and the execution of laws (Article II). The bill seeks to limit the President's authority in an area where executive orders have historically played a significant role. The constitutionality of such a limitation would likely depend on the specific circumstances and the extent to which it infringes on the President's constitutional powers.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).