H.R.1649 - Expanding Student Access to Mental Health Services Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1649, the "Expanding Student Access to Mental Health Services Act," aims to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to improve mental health services for students. The bill focuses on allowing states and local educational agencies to use federal funds to enhance mental health support in schools. It encourages the implementation of best practices, emergency planning, and coordination with local health agencies, including the use of telehealth services.
Expected Effects
The bill's passage would likely result in increased funding and resources directed towards mental health services in schools. This could lead to improved identification and treatment of mental health issues among students. It may also foster better collaboration between schools and mental health professionals.
Potential Benefits
- Improved access to mental health services for students.
- Early identification and intervention for mental health issues.
- Enhanced coordination between schools and mental health providers.
- Increased use of technology, including telehealth, to deliver mental health services.
- Potential reduction in stigma associated with mental health issues.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased federal spending and associated debt.
- Risk of inefficient allocation of funds if programs are not properly managed.
- Possible overreach of federal government into local education decisions.
- Concerns about data privacy related to student mental health information.
- Potential for unfunded mandates on states and local educational agencies.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is based on the General Welfare Clause (Article I, Section 8), which allows Congress to provide for the general welfare of the United States. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states, raising potential concerns about federal overreach into education, which is traditionally a state responsibility. However, the bill primarily focuses on providing funding and guidance, which can be argued as promoting the general welfare without unduly infringing on state autonomy.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).