H.R.1668 - End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1668, the "End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act," aims to terminate the Shelter and Services Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The bill prohibits FEMA from supporting sheltering and related activities for relieving overcrowding in U.S. Customs and Border Protection short-term holding facilities. It also rescinds unobligated balances from specific appropriations acts related to these activities.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is a reduction in federal support for sheltering and services provided to individuals in short-term holding facilities managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This could lead to increased strain on state and local resources, as well as potential humanitarian concerns regarding the treatment of individuals in these facilities. The bill also redirects funding away from FEMA's sheltering programs.
Potential Benefits
- Potential reduction in federal spending and a decrease in the national debt.
- May incentivize stricter border enforcement policies.
- Could alleviate perceived burdens on communities providing resources to undocumented immigrants.
- May deter illegal immigration due to reduced access to support services.
- Could free up FEMA resources for other disaster relief efforts.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential strain on state and local resources to provide shelter and services.
- Possible humanitarian concerns regarding the treatment of asylum seekers and other migrants.
- Increased overcrowding in short-term holding facilities.
- Potential legal challenges based on humanitarian grounds.
- Negative impact on public health due to inadequate shelter and sanitation.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. While Congress has the power to control federal spending under Article I, Section 8, its actions must also align with constitutional protections for individuals, regardless of immigration status. Arguments could be made regarding the Fifth Amendment's due process clause and the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment if the bill leads to inhumane treatment of individuals in custody. Additionally, the bill does not appear to violate any specific enumerated rights, but its implementation could raise concerns about equal protection under the law.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).