H.R.1681 - Expediting Federal Broadband Deployment Reviews Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1681, the "Unhandcuffing Police to Locate and Interdict Foreign Transgressors Act" or the "UPLIFT Act," aims to amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. The bill seeks to expand the prohibition on state noncompliance with federal immigration law enforcement. It mandates greater cooperation between state and local entities with federal immigration authorities, particularly in sanctuary jurisdictions.
Expected Effects
The bill would broaden the scope of permissible state and local law enforcement activities related to immigration enforcement. It would also grant immunity to state and local entities complying with DHS detainers. Additionally, it establishes a cause of action for victims of crimes committed by aliens released due to non-compliance with detainers.
Potential Benefits
- Increased cooperation between local and federal law enforcement could lead to more effective crime prevention.
- The bill aims to reduce the flow of illicit drugs by targeting transnational criminal organizations.
- Victims of crimes committed by released aliens may have legal recourse.
- Clarifying the authority of ICE detainers could streamline immigration enforcement.
- The bill provides standing for local jurisdictions to seek injunctive relief against states not complying with federal immigration laws.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- The bill could lead to increased racial profiling and discrimination.
- It may erode trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement.
- The expansion of immigration detention could raise human rights concerns.
- Increased cooperation with ICE may strain local resources.
- The bill could face legal challenges based on constitutional concerns related to federal overreach.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is debatable. Proponents might argue it aligns with the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8) by enabling the federal government to enforce immigration laws effectively. Opponents could argue that it infringes on states' rights under the Tenth Amendment by compelling them to enforce federal laws and potentially violates the Fourth Amendment due to potential for unreasonable searches and seizures.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).