Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

H.R.1692 - Producing Advanced Technologies for Homeland Security Act; PATHS Act (119th Congress)

Summary

H.R. 1692, the "Producing Advanced Technologies for Homeland Security Act" or "PATHS Act," aims to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The bill extends the research and development acquisition pilot program, specifically regarding other transaction authority, until September 30, 2028. It also mandates notification to relevant congressional committees within 72 hours of using or extending transaction authority involving artificial intelligence technology.

Furthermore, the bill reduces the amount of covered contract awards under a section of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, lowering it from $4,000,000 to $1,000,000.

In essence, the PATHS Act seeks to promote secure and trustworthy technology development for homeland security by extending existing authorities and adjusting contract award thresholds.

Expected Effects

The PATHS Act will likely lead to continued and potentially expanded use of other transaction authority (OTA) for homeland security technology development. The reduced contract award amount may encourage more small businesses and startups to participate in government contracts. The notification requirement for AI-related transactions aims to increase congressional oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) technology acquisition activities.

Potential Benefits

  • Facilitates faster adoption of advanced technologies for homeland security.
  • Encourages innovation by providing flexible contracting mechanisms.
  • Increases congressional oversight of AI technology usage within DHS.
  • Potentially lowers barriers for smaller companies to engage in DHS projects.
  • Extends a program deemed beneficial for technology acquisition.

Potential Disadvantages

  • May reduce transparency compared to traditional contracting methods if OTA is overused.
  • Could lead to less competition if certain companies are favored under OTA.
  • The reduced contract award amount might make larger, more complex projects less feasible.
  • Increased reliance on AI could raise concerns about bias and accountability.
  • Potential for misuse of authority if oversight mechanisms are not robust.

Constitutional Alignment

The Act appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. The extension of research and development programs and the adjustment of contract award thresholds fall within Congress's purview to enact laws necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers. The notification requirements to congressional committees also support the principle of checks and balances.

However, the use of "other transaction authority" could raise concerns about transparency and accountability, potentially implicating due process considerations if not implemented fairly. No specific constitutional rights appear to be directly infringed by this legislation.

Overall, the Act seems constitutionally sound, provided that the delegated authority is exercised responsibly and with appropriate oversight.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).