H.R.1711 - DHS Intelligence and Analysis Oversight and Transparency Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1711, the "DHS Intelligence and Analysis Oversight and Transparency Act," mandates annual audits of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis's information systems and bulk data. It requires the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis to conduct these audits and report findings to Congress. The bill also defines key terms like "bulk data" and "discriminants" to clarify the scope of the audits.
Expected Effects
The bill aims to increase transparency and oversight of DHS intelligence activities. This will be achieved through regular audits and congressional notifications regarding the use of bulk data. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) will also review the implementation of the audit requirements after four years.
Potential Benefits
- Increased transparency in DHS intelligence operations.
- Enhanced congressional oversight of bulk data usage.
- Improved accountability of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
- Clearer definitions of key terms related to data collection and analysis.
- Potential for more effective use of intelligence resources through regular audits.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased administrative burden on the DHS.
- Risk of delayed intelligence gathering due to audit requirements.
- Possible exposure of sensitive information during audits, despite oversight guidelines.
- Costs associated with conducting annual audits and GAO reviews.
- Potential for political disagreements over the interpretation of audit findings.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the Constitution by promoting transparency and accountability in government operations, particularly concerning potential impacts on individual liberties. Regular audits and congressional oversight can help ensure that intelligence activities remain within constitutional bounds. The emphasis on oversight aligns with the principle of checks and balances, preventing potential abuses of power.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).