H.R.1792 - No Tax Dollars for the United Nation’s Immigration Invasion Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1792, the "No Tax Dollars for the United Nation's Immigration Invasion Act," aims to prohibit U.S. contributions to the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The bill also mandates a study and audit by the Comptroller General to identify federal assistance programs providing funds to these organizations. The report would detail the amount of funds provided and assess potential repayments to the U.S. government.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would immediately halt U.S. financial support to the specified UN agencies. This could significantly impact the operations of IOM, UNHCR, and UNRWA, potentially reducing their capacity to provide aid and assistance to migrants, refugees, and Palestinian refugees. The required GAO study would provide Congress with detailed information on past funding and potential financial recoveries.
Potential Benefits
- Potential reduction in U.S. taxpayer burden by eliminating contributions to the specified UN agencies.
- Increased congressional oversight and accountability regarding U.S. funding of international organizations.
- Opportunity to reallocate funds to other domestic programs or initiatives.
- May incentivize other nations to increase their contributions to these UN agencies.
- Could lead to a reassessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of these UN programs.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential reduction in humanitarian aid and support for vulnerable populations, including refugees and migrants.
- Strain on international relations and cooperation with the United Nations.
- Possible negative impact on U.S. foreign policy objectives related to migration, refugees, and humanitarian assistance.
- Risk of destabilizing regions reliant on UN assistance, potentially leading to increased conflict and displacement.
- Damage to the U.S.'s reputation as a global leader in humanitarian aid.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's prohibition on funding to specific UN organizations falls under Congress's power of the purse, as granted by Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution, which states that "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." The GAO study and audit also align with Congress's oversight responsibilities. However, the potential impact on international relations and treaty obligations may raise questions regarding the President's authority in foreign affairs.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).